Criteria Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Not completed Part One: Mini literature review 10 marks Introduce the topic - Title clearly outlines the topic of the review.
- The introduction provides a well-defined background and context, offering a comprehensive overview. It provides a clear plan of how the literature review is structured.
2.0 - The title effectively outlines the review's topic, though with minor room for improvement.
- The introduction provides a good background and context, offering a comprehensive overview. It provides a clear plan of how the literature review is structured.
1.5 - The title may not outline the topic area or be too general.
- The introduction provides an adequate background and context but lacks detail.
1.0 - The title does not provide a clear outline of the review topic or is incomplete.
- The introduction lacks a well-defined background and context, and the overview is not comprehensive.
0.5 No attempt made to outline the review's topic in the title (eg. “Literature review”).
The introduction is missing or significantly incomplete, providing no background, context, or plan of organisation.
0 Content - Articulates a concise summary of essential information pertaining to the chosen topic, demonstrating clear organisation and structure.
- Integrates the literature in a logical manner to construct a well- organised and coherent review of the topic area.
2.0 - Constructs a well- organised summary of essential information related to the chosen topic, showcasing good organisation and structure.
- Integrates the literature logically to build a review of the topic area that is generally well- structured and coherent.
1.5 - Develops an adequately structured summary of key information concerning the chosen topic, with acceptable organisation.
- Incorporates the literature in a satisfactory manner to form a review that is reasonably organised and coherent.
1.0 - Presents a summary of key information related to the chosen topic with notable gaps or lack of clarity, lacking clear organisation and structure.
- Integration of the literature is not logical, resulting in a review that lacks coherence and effective organisation, which impacts on readability.
0.5 - Does not articulate a summary of key information related to the chosen topic, and the construction of a review is either absent or significantly incomplete.
0 Conclusion - The conclusion provides a clear, logical summary of the primary takeaways and insights/ future directions extracted from the review.
1.0 - The conclusion presents a good summary of the primary takeaways and insights obtained from the review.
0.75 - The conclusion gives an adequate summary of the key takeaways and insights from the review.
0.5 - The conclusion's summary of key takeaways and insights lacks clarity or completeness.
0.25 - The conclusion is either missing or significantly incomplete.
0 Readability - The writing is clear, well- structured and easy to read.
- Written at a level suitable for a BABS1201 audience. The content is effectively tailored to their level of understanding.
