Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: zz-x2580
MGTS7607 Managing Ethical Issues in Future
Marking Rubric
Below Expectations Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding
Criterion 1
Introduction
(2 marks)
You have not provided a satisfactory context to your essay
overall, or the Introduction is missing. You have not
provided an adequate summary of your essay, and the
structure and purpose are missing or poorly described.
You have provided an adequate context to your essay,
supported by some scholarly sources. You have provided
an appropriate summary of your essay although this could
be improved overall.
You have provided a clear and convincing context to your
essay, supported by relevant scholarly sources. You have
provided a very good summary of your essay, including the
structure and purpose.
You have provided an exceptionally clear and convincing
context to your essay, supported by relevant scholarly
sources. You have provided a comprehensive summary of
your essay, including the structure and purpose.
Criterion 2
Summary of Ethical Issue
(3 marks)
You have not provided a satisfactory summary of the
ethical issue and you have failed to appropriately
address multiple elements of this criterion, including
prevalence and impact of the issue. Overall, your
discussion of the ethical issue is superficial and generally
unconvincing.
You have provided a satisfactory definition of the ethical
issue. You have included some relevant evidence for the
prevalence of the issue and its impact on (or
consequences for) organisations, although this could be
more convincing. The discussion is cohesive and
supported by appropriate scholarly evidence overall.
You have provided an appropriate definition of the ethical
issue supported by at least one peer-reviewed source. You
have included relevant evidence for the prevalence of the
issue and its impact on (or consequences for)
organisations. The discussion is cohesive and well-
supported by appropriate scholarly evidence.
You have provided an appropriate definition of the
ethical issue supported by at least one peer-reviewed
source. You have included very persuasive evidence for
the prevalence of the issue and its impact on (or
consequences for) organisations. The discussion is highly
cohesive and well-supported by appropriate scholarly
evidence.
Criterion 3
Relevance of Ethical
Issue to Work
Context
(2 marks)
You have not built a persuasive argument for why it is
important to know how to manage your chosen ethical
issue in your personal work context, or your argument is
missing. You have not supported your argument with
appropriate sources.
You have created an adequate argument for why it is
important to know how to manage your chosen ethical
issue in your personal work context, although some
aspects could be described in greater clarity and/or depth.
Your argument is supported by some appropriate sources
although this could be improved.
You have created a convincing argument for why it is
important to know how to manage your chosen ethical
issue in your personal work context, based on
appropriate scholarly sources.
You have created a very convincing argument for why it is
important to know how to manage your chosen ethical
issue in your personal work context, based on very
appropriate scholarly sources.
Criterion 4
Analysis of Challenges of
Managing Ethical Issue
(4 marks)
You have been more descriptive, rather than analytical, in
discussing the challenges of managing your ethical issue in
the workplace. There is a lack of scholarly evidence to
support your analysis. You have failed to consider your
personal context and/or explain how this may affect how
you manage the issue. Your analysis is unconvincing
overall.
You have provided a satisfactory analysis of 2-3 challenges
of managing your ethical issue in the workplace. Your
analysis is supported by some relevant scholarly evidence,
although this could be improved. There is some
consideration of your personal context and explanation of
how this may affect how you manage the issue, but this is
superficial in places. Though too descriptive in parts, your
argument for the challenges of managing the ethical issue
is adequate overall.
You have provided a comprehensive analysis of 2-3
challenges of managing your ethical issue in the
workplace. Your analysis is supported by
appropriate scholarly evidence. You have
considered your personal context and explained
how this may affect how you manage the issue. You
have demonstrated some original thinking. Overall,
your argument for the challenges of managing the
ethical issue is convincing.
You have provided a very comprehensive analysis of
2-3 challenges of managing your ethical issue in the
workplace. Your analysis is supported by highly
appropriate scholarly evidence. You have
thoughtfully considered your personal context and
explained how this may affect how you manage the
issue. You have demonstrated original, independent
and insightful thinking. Overall, your argument for
the challenges of managing the ethical issue is
exceptionally convincing.
Criterion 5
Ethics Action Plan
(5 marks)
Your plan is either missing or fails to address multiple
requirements. In particular, there is little to no discussion
of actions you can take to prepare yourself to manage the
ethical issue effectively in future, or the proposed actions
are inappropriate. You have not adequately considered
gaps in your knowledge, skills and/or experience that need
to be improved. Your suggestions for improvement are
either inappropriate or missing. Overall, the plan lacks logic
and practicality. Little to no scholarly evidence and
appropriate reflections are included.
You have created a satisfactory plan overall. You have
discussed three actions you can take to prepare yourself to
manage the ethical issue effectively in future but these
could be described with greater depth and/or clarity. The
plan includes some identification of relevant gaps in your
knowledge, skills and/or experience that could be
improved. The actions address the areas for improvement
but could be more convincing. Some scholarly evidence
and reflections are included but these could be more
relevant and/or integrated more effectively.
You have created a comprehensive plan overall. You have
discussed three actions you can take to prepare yourself
to manage the ethical issue effectively in future. The plan
includes identification of relevant gaps in your knowledge,
skills and/or experience that could be improved. The
actions appropriately address the areas for improvement.
The plan is generally logical, practical, and well-supported
by evidence from the scholarly literature and your own
reflections.
You have created a convincing and comprehensive plan
overall. You have discussed three actions you can take
to prepare yourself to manage the ethical issue
effectively in future. The plan includes identification of
relevant gaps in your knowledge, skills and/or
experience that could be improved. The actions clearly
and appropriately address the areas for improvement.
The plan is exceptionally logical, practical, and well-
supported by evidence from the scholarly literature and
your own thoughtful reflections.
Criterion 6
Writing
(2 marks)
The structure of your essay is poorly planned and/or
sequenced. Your writing is highly disjointed with poor
sentence structure. Your tone is not professional. There are
numerous spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors
which makes your writing confusing and difficult for the
reader to follow.
The structure of your essay reflects evidence of planning
and sequencing ability. A generally appropriate tone is
used, though there are some disruptions to the fluency of
your writing. You have made a sound attempt to correctly
use punctuation, grammar and spelling, with minor errors
and the occasional
major error.
The structure of your essay shows strong planning and
sequencing abilities. Your writing is mostly fluent and the
essay is written in an appropriate professional tone.
Mostly correct punctuation, grammar and spelling are used
throughout, with only the occasional minor error.
The structure of your essay shows very strong planning
and sequencing abilities. Your writing is exceptionally fluent
and the essay is written in an appropriate professional
tone. Correct use of punctuation, grammar and spelling
enhances the readability of your essay.
Criterion 7
Presentation
(2 marks)
Overall, the essay is poorly presented and lacks
professional insight. There are multiple, consistent errors in
the in-text citations and/or Reference List, and the essay is
substantially over or under the required word limit.
Though not entirely professional in its look, the essay is
presented with a title page, page numbering, double-
spacing and appropriate margins. A single referencing style
is generally used throughout. Though there are some
errors in the in-text citations and/or Reference List, the
essay is within the required word limit (+/-10%). Any
Appendices are presented in an appropriate format,
although this could be improved.
